POLICY ISSUES

Innovation & Competitiveness

Intellectual Property

Productivity & Innovation

Science and R&D Policy

Skills & Education

Information Technology

Digital Economy & Society

e-Government

Opposition to IT

Telecommunications

Global Markets

Globalization

RECEIVE UPDATES

Join Our Email List

Join us on LinkedIn

Reports & Events Feed  RSS

Tech Policy Podcast  RSS

SUPPORT ITIF

Contribute Now

SPECIAL PROJECTS

BusinessWeek

Innovation Economics

Huffington Post

Huffington Post

Internet Evolution

Privacy Working Group

Washington Watch

SEARCH

***This is an archive of the old ITIF website. Content on this website will not be updated. Please visit our new website to see our latest content.***

Policy Issues
Report

Economic Doctrines and Policy Differences: Why Washington Can’t Agree on Economic Policies


By Robert Atkinson and David Audretsch
September 11, 2008

In an election year when both presidential candidates in the United States are confronted with a troubled economy, the current U.S. political dialogue is giving scant attention to innovation and policy to promote innovative activity.

Innovation policy has gotten short shrift in the U.S. political dialogue largely because the three dominant economic policy models – conservative neoclassical, liberal neoclassical and neo-Keynesian economic doctrines– advocated by most economic advisors, and implicitly held by most Washington policymakers, ignore the role of innovation and technology in achieving economic growth in the global, knowledge-based economy of the 21st century. Unfortunately, while the U.S. economy has been transformed by the forces of technology, globalization, and entrepreneurship, the doctrines guiding economic policymakers have not kept pace and continue to be informed by 20th century conceptualizations, models, and theories.

Fortunately, as described in this policy brief, a new theory and narrative of economic growth based on an explicit effort to understand and model how technological advances have emerged in the last decade. This new economic doctrine on the block— called “innovation economics”—reformulates the traditional model of economic growth so that knowledge, technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation are positioned at the center of the model rather than seen as independent forces that are largely unaffected by policy.

This policy brief briefly explains the three prevailing economic doctrines, as well as the newer doctrine of innovation economics, that are competing for the attention and allegiance of U.S. policymakers. In addition to discussing each doctrine’s principles, goals, and what each believes about the economy, it discusses the advantages and limitations of each economic doctrine. Finally, it examines how each doctrine views particular real-world economic challenges and the different types of policy prescriptions that result from each.

Read the full text of this report.

Related Links

http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/economic_theory/robert-d-atkinson

Rob Atkinson selected as a “best thinker” for his work on innovation economics.“:
http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/economics/economic_theory/robert-d-atkinson
February 1, 2010
Rob Atkinson selected as a “best thinker” for his work on innovation economics.

Innovation Economics: A 21st Century Alternative to the Neo-Classical
June 4, 2009
Rob Atkinson discusses innovation economics as a a better model for economic growth at the National Economists Club.

Innovation Economics and Trade Policy
October 2nd, 2008

Building a 21st Century Economic Framework
October 1st, 2008

Innovation Economics for the Next Administration
September 25, 2008

An Innovation Economics Agenda for the Next Administration
September 24, 2008

Discover Your Economic Type